<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The past and future of Homesite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.figby.com/archives/2005/04/18/the-past-and-future-of-homesite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.figby.com/archives/2005/04/18/the-past-and-future-of-homesite/</link>
	<description>A weblog by Michael Moncur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed,  1 Sep 2010 23:43:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: delpino</title>
		<link>http://www.figby.com/archives/2005/04/18/the-past-and-future-of-homesite/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>delpino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3459#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think they should make Homesite open-source, this would kickstart its development as there are many fans out there.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should make Homesite open-source, this would kickstart its development as there are many fans out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.figby.com/archives/2005/04/18/the-past-and-future-of-homesite/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 21:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3459#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Took your advice and downloaded a demo of TopStyle 3.0... I have used the free &quot;lite&quot; version for CSS, but this Pro version 
is much more than just a CSS tool... it is very configurable and has Nick Bradbury&#039;s flair with interfaces that made 
HomeSite such an old friend. This tool seems like it will do the job, and it even let me configure a mapping 
so I could preview PHP files. $79.00 but seems worth it, I will probably buy it!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took your advice and downloaded a demo of TopStyle 3.0&#8230; I have used the free &#8220;lite&#8221; version for CSS, but this Pro version<br />
is much more than just a CSS tool&#8230; it is very configurable and has Nick Bradbury&#8217;s flair with interfaces that made<br />
HomeSite such an old friend. This tool seems like it will do the job, and it even let me configure a mapping<br />
so I could preview PHP files. $79.00 but seems worth it, I will probably buy it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.figby.com/archives/2005/04/18/the-past-and-future-of-homesite/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 16:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3459#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I too am in the same boat as you with HomeSite. I bought it early on and am just trying to ween myself off. 
In fact I came across your site searching for any news or speculation on the future of HomeSite, now that Adobe owns it. 
I also have big misgivings on the future of FreeHand also, figuring Adobe will stick with Illustrator. One program I 
have found that is very HomeSite-like is Rapid PHP 2005. Not as rock solid as HomeSite, but has more PHP features 
and for $30 a good deal (they make HTMLPad also, but RapidPHP combines all of the features of all of their programs 
into one. Has good CSS tools also. I am not affiliated with the company. More info is at http://www.blumentals.net/rapidphp/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am in the same boat as you with HomeSite. I bought it early on and am just trying to ween myself off.<br />
In fact I came across your site searching for any news or speculation on the future of HomeSite, now that Adobe owns it.<br />
I also have big misgivings on the future of FreeHand also, figuring Adobe will stick with Illustrator. One program I<br />
have found that is very HomeSite-like is Rapid PHP 2005. Not as rock solid as HomeSite, but has more PHP features<br />
and for $30 a good deal (they make HTMLPad also, but RapidPHP combines all of the features of all of their programs<br />
into one. Has good CSS tools also. I am not affiliated with the company. More info is at <a href="http://www.blumentals.net/rapidphp/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.blumentals.net/rapidphp/'>http://www.blumentals.net/rapidphp/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.figby.com/archives/2005/04/18/the-past-and-future-of-homesite/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 23:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3459#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Got &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/imac/&quot; title=&quot;Mac&quot;&gt;Mac&lt;/a&gt;? Have you tried &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.barebones.com/products/bbedit/index.shtml&quot; title=&quot;BBEdit&quot;&gt;BBEdit&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got <a href="http://www.apple.com/imac/" title="Mac">Mac</a>? Have you tried <a href="http://www.barebones.com/products/bbedit/index.shtml" title="BBEdit">BBEdit</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Schriner´s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.figby.com/archives/2005/04/18/the-past-and-future-of-homesite/#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Schriner´s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3459#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The end of Homesite?&lt;/strong&gt;
As questioned in a lot of places (here (Nick Bradbury), here) the recent anouncment on the aquisition of Macromedia by Adobe makes the future of Homesite very uncertain.I used Homesite when I started with Webdev (1999), and at that time it seemed like a g&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The end of Homesite?</strong><br />
As questioned in a lot of places (here (Nick Bradbury), here) the recent anouncment on the aquisition of Macromedia by Adobe makes the future of Homesite very uncertain.I used Homesite when I started with Webdev (1999), and at that time it seemed like a g</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
